If you would love to pick out something from Microsoft, or its ERP subdivision – Microsoft Business Solutions, and in case of a big public business enterprise, you need to consider these three: Axapta, Navision or Great Plains. We do not speak me about Solomon right here, due to the fact its miles recommended for venture organization. You have to possibly be aware of the unique product existence cycle (or is it new or mature one on the market), database platform, common implementation cycle, normal customization necessities, wealthy vs.
Popular ERP capability, etc. Also, you must get a comparison from a tremendous goal source in case you are asking to examine somebody, who implements and sells Great Plains – more likely these humans will try to show which you need Great Plains and it is the fine in shape. On the alternative hand, in case you ask large consulting exercise with regional offices to make an assessment for you-you need to understand that precise nearby workplace may function with most independence and promote, say Navision simplest.
Product Life Cycle. Both Navision and Great Plains have to be considered as mature products, have more than 10 years of a successful presence on the ERP marketplace. Navision is greater famous in Europe, Navision Software changed into a Denmark based software improvement agency – it becomes offered by means of Microsoft at the beginning of the XXI century. Navision is likewise present on the US market, however, we’d say it suits unique marketplace niches. Great Plains Software became additionally bought via Microsoft a bit earlier than Navision Software and GP is historically had superb positions inside the US, Australia, New Zealand, UK, Middle East, South Africa, Poland, Pakistan. Axapta is an exceptionally new ERP and it became launched at the start of the XXI century. However, it’s far genuinely scaled up for large agencies and its income growth hastily.
Rich vs. Standard Functionality. This is a totally philosophical question. There are a couple of opinions. 1990th had been the years, whilst the large businesses needed to stick to rich capability ERP: SAP, PeopleSoft, Oracle Financials. Our opinion on the future is that wealthy functionality isn’t always vital – you ought to realize that mild or center size customization is the cheaper and greater bendy answer. Also, the specific business techniques can be a fashionable factor and it’ll be not viable to program a wealthy-capability module for only a few businesses on the marketplace. Consider dotcom organizations of the overdue 1990th, that went public – their commercial enterprise methods are very unique and revolutionary.
Database Platform. Navision has a local (or C/SIDE) platform as well as it’s far available on MS SQL Server. Do no longer be frightened of the Native database – it has legendary power. SQL will give you greater integration and reporting alternatives (past Jet-Reports) – you can deploy Crystal reports (without C/ODBC). Great Plains is now (because of model eight.0) on MS SQL Server most effective
Implementation Cycle. Here we see lots of evaluations as well. We believe that Great Plains is the easiest to setup and launch. Navision usually requires mid-size customization. Axapta generally requires longer implementation cycle – however once more it is a particularly new and modern product. Integration with Unix/Linux/Oracle. This is a completely regular question for a large enterprise. We would say that this integration is normally programmed on SQL level and XML inbound/outbound streams. So, SQL based totally ERP need to be OK.